Day 24: Co-investor share template

Score → paragraph → ask. Three lines, one Slack message, one new co-investor convert.

Yesterday

Yesterday you built the false-positive override. Today you make the framework readable to people who don't run it themselves.

Why this signal matters

A composite score is illegible to a co-investor who doesn't know your framework. A three-line template that translates 'composite 5/6, sharp acceleration' into a paragraph they can act on is the difference between solo conviction and syndicate conviction.

The 5-minute exercise

1Write a 3-line template. Line 1: org + composite + sector. Line 2: the standout signal in plain English. Line 3: the question or ask.
2Test it on one co-investor with a recent watchlist standout.
3Iterate the template based on their reply (or non-reply).
4Save the template alongside your watchlist CSV.

What you’re filtering for

A template that produces a reply from a co-investor at least 50% of the time. If 0/5 replies, the line 2 (signal in plain English) is too jargon-heavy — rewrite to lead with the implication, not the metric.

Edge case

Some co-investors never reply to text intel — they need a meeting. Adapt: 'composite 5/6, want to hop on a 15 to discuss?' is a different ask but the same format.

Bonus

When the template starts producing 'who else have you shared this with' replies, you've graduated from sourcing to syndicate-leading. That's a different power level.

Tomorrow

Tomorrow: the IDE/MCP integration. The manual system runs in the browser; the automated layer runs in your editor.

Curriculum: /challenge · Methodology: /methodology · Paper: ssrn.com/abstract=6606558