Different investors use VC Deal Flow Signal differently. Pick the persona closest to your workflow for a detailed breakdown of the problem, the solution, and the weekly workflow. If your question is practical rather than theoretical, this is the shortest route into a real operating use case.
Route the workflow correctly
Use the workflow page when you want to know how this fits into real sourcing. Then move into proof, compare, or buyer pages depending on what you still need to verify.
For Angel investors
Catch technical startups 6-12 weeks before the round is competitive — without an enterprise sourcing budget.
Read workflow →For VC analysts
Scale weekly sourcing across 20 technical sectors without manually monitoring GitHub at 2am.
Read workflow →For Fund of funds / LPs
Benchmark your VCs' sourcing quality against a common engineering signal, and spot emerging GPs with better deal flow before everyone else does.
Read workflow →For Scout investors
Source one defensible signal per week your fund's GP did not already see.
Read workflow →For Solo GPs
Source like a 10-person institutional fund — without hiring 10 people.
Read workflow →For Corporate VCs
Source strategic opportunities upstream of institutional VC pricing pressure.
Read workflow →For Accelerator program scouts
Identify program-fit founders three months before they apply.
Read workflow →For Portfolio operators
Track every portfolio company's engineering pace without scheduling check-in calls.
Read workflow →For Due diligence analysts
Verify engineering claims with public data instead of taking the founder's word.
Read workflow →For LP research analysts
Evaluate GP sourcing claims with portfolio-level engineering metrics.
Read workflow →For Seed-stage fund partners
Catch the seed-to-Series-A acceleration window when terms are most favorable.
Read workflow →For Series A fund partners
Identify Series A-ready startups before the deck arrives in your inbox.
Read workflow →