One top-100 per platform · Literal rosters · 300 entries
One mixed top-100 list isn’t enough. The discipline behind this site’s sales architecture is explicit: one top-100 per platform. Each platform has its own auto-mod, its own cadence, its own way of removing pitches and rewarding signal. Treating Reddit, HN, and X as one mixed list collapses that map.
So this page splits the master list at /target-list into three platform-specific top-100 rosters. Each entry is status-flagged with the same scheme used everywhere else — engage, watch, hold, read, blocked — so the page reads as a working attention map, not a wishlist.
Anonymity rule, restated: every entry is a public surface — a subreddit, a category page, a public account. We don’t name individuals we track inside the paid product. That’s the buyer’s edge, not ours to publish.
/voices/reddit
100 entries100 subreddits where the developer-investor's audience already lives.
Reddit's auto-mod removes any post that names a product on the venture-side subs. So this list is engagement-by-comment-only — never main-post pitches. Top-down by ICP fit.
Open the roster →
/voices/hacker-news
100 entries100 HN attention slots — categories, search lanes, leaderboards, adjacent feeds.
HN doesn't have 100 'voices' the way Reddit does — it has attention slots. Each slot here is a category (Show HN: AI infra), a saved Algolia search lane, a leaderboard surface, or an adjacent digest. Together they form the literal HN attention map.
Open the roster →
/voices/twitter
100 entries100 X / Twitter accounts — VCs, devtool founders, engineering-investors.
We read; we don't broadcast. Anonymity rule. Our company account posts own-product threads on Tuesdays and Fridays; we never @-reply individuals. The 100 accounts here are read-of-record, not engagement targets.
Open the roster →
Why split the master list
The same developer-investor reads X in the morning, Reddit at lunch, and HN before bed. But the platforms reward and punish very different posting shapes. Reddit auto-mods anything that names a product on the venture-side subs. HN front-page mechanics don’t tolerate self-promotion at all. X rewards consistency more than quality. Each surface needs its own list, its own cadence, and its own honest engagement status — which is why one big mixed roster misses the point.
The companion list at /target-list stays as the ICP-scored master roster across publication formats (substacks, podcasts, newsletters, GitHub orgs, conferences, books, frameworks, communities, LinkedIn pages, datasets). The three rosters here are platform-shape-specific extensions of that map, ready for the engagement layer.
How this list compounds
Every Tuesday and Friday at 14:00 EEST, the company-side surfaces cycle through the engage-tagged entries on each platform — Reddit comments first, X queue second, HN read-only third. The hard ceilings (4 LinkedIn replies / week, 2 Reddit comments / week, 0 HN posts during the account-block window) come from each platform’s rules, not ours.
We publish the rosters because every dispatch is reproducible from this page. If a developer-investor wants to mirror the cadence, three Tuesday-and-Friday hours per week is the entire workload.
Refreshed 2026-05-09. Each roster is regenerated quarterly. Status flags update weekly when engagement state changes (e.g. account block resolves, auto-mod rule changes, a sub goes private).