Loading...
Space tech is the only sector where the cheque needs nine zeros — wait quadrant for everyone else.
Scope: Launch, satellite hardware, ground stations, earth observation, in-orbit servicing, defence-adjacent space, satellite data analytics.
Cost-to-build
96/100
Hardware, launch slots, regulatory clearance, and team-quality requirements compound to the highest cost-to-build on the site.
Deal-velocity
36/100
Engineering acceleration in space-tech is increasingly software-led (satellite-data analytics) which shortens the signal window for that sub-niche; the launch/hardware tail still runs in multi-year cycles.
Live signal: 4 space tech startups currently tracked for Q2 2026. See the roster →
Where Space Tech lands
Build
Build it yourself
Fund
Write the cheque
Avoid
Reroute the energy
Wait
Wait or partner
High cost-to-build, low deal-velocity. Capital-trap territory — stand down, partner with an incumbent, or stage cheques against milestones instead of announcements.
The honest version
Cost-to-build is the highest on the site. Velocity has improved as satellite-data plays (effectively SaaS) absorbed some space-tech burn, but the dominant capital cycle still measures in years. This is dedicated-thesis territory for the smallest set of investors; founders without prior space-industry exposure should look elsewhere.
If you are building
Fits when: You are shipping satellite-data analytics or ground-software, not hardware.
If you are funding
Fits when: You have a dedicated space-tech thesis, nine-figure capacity, and patience for decade-long cycles.
Yes — treat it as vertical SaaS with a space tag. The build-vs-invest math for that sub-niche resembles enterprise SaaS rather than space-tech.
Because satellite-data analytics has compressed velocity for one sub-niche. If you filter to launch / hardware only, velocity is materially lower than the score shown.
Healthcare is the patient capital quadrant — and most founders forget the patient.
Supply chain is the slowest-moving sector we track — bet on capital, not on velocity.
Robotics is the most capital-intensive sector — wait quadrant for almost everyone.
PropTech is the slowest fund-quadrant adjacent we track — avoid the indie path.
AgTech is hardware-heavy, slow, and only fundable inside a dedicated thesis.
Every sector we track lives somewhere on the 2×2 — the index page groups all 20 verdicts in one place.