Loading...
Robotics is the most capital-intensive sector — wait quadrant for almost everyone.
Scope: Industrial robotics, humanoid, mobile robotics, drones, simulation, robot operating systems, AI-controlled manipulation.
Cost-to-build
92/100
BoM costs, custom hardware, and simulation environments routinely consume €10M before the first commercial unit.
Deal-velocity
44/100
Engineering acceleration in robotics is increasingly software-led (AI controllers) which shortens the signal window — but the hardware tail still extends revenue 12–18 months past the signal.
Live signal: 7 robotics startups currently tracked for Q2 2026. See the roster →
Where Robotics lands
Build
Build it yourself
Fund
Write the cheque
Avoid
Reroute the energy
Wait
Wait or partner
High cost-to-build, low deal-velocity. Capital-trap territory — stand down, partner with an incumbent, or stage cheques against milestones instead of announcements.
The honest version
Cost-to-build is the highest on the site outside space-tech: hardware, simulation infrastructure, and team-quality requirements compound. Velocity has improved as AI controllers absorbed some robotics burn, but the signal-to-revenue lag remains long. The honest framing is: this is not a sector to enter without nine-figure conviction.
If you are building
Fits when: You are shipping a robotics-adjacent software layer (simulation, MLops for robotics, operator tooling), not a robot itself.
If you are funding
Fits when: You have a hard-tech thesis with patient capital and you can stage cheques against milestones, not announcements.
Humanoids inherit every robotics constraint plus an additional public-attention discount. The build-vs-invest framework would treat them as a sub-niche of robotics with even higher cost-to-build and slightly higher (because of public attention) deal velocity.
Only adjacent — simulation, dev tools, controller infrastructure. Building a physical robot solo is not on the table on conventional venture timelines.
Healthcare is the patient capital quadrant — and most founders forget the patient.
Supply chain is the slowest-moving sector we track — bet on capital, not on velocity.
PropTech is the slowest fund-quadrant adjacent we track — avoid the indie path.
AgTech is hardware-heavy, slow, and only fundable inside a dedicated thesis.
Space tech is the only sector where the cheque needs nine zeros — wait quadrant for everyone else.
Every sector we track lives somewhere on the 2×2 — the index page groups all 20 verdicts in one place.
When the verdict isn’t enough
The free Monday email tells you which way the wind is blowing. If roboticsis the call you’re weighing this quarter, two faster moves: pull the live teardown on this one sector, or watch every sector week over week so you see the team pulling ahead before it shows up in someone’s deck.
Pressure-test one sector
€7
One sector, one teardown, one sitting. The same read your analyst would spend an afternoon on — who’s shipping like they’re about to raise, and who just looks busy. Cheaper than the coffee you’d buy to ask around.
Test one sector — €7 →Watch it move every week
€9.97/mo
The standing dashboard across every sector we track — so the team that quietly doubled overnight lands in front of you, not in front of the partner who beat you to the term sheet. The deck lags the work by 21 to 47 days; this is where you spend that head start.
Get the dashboard — €9.97/mo →