Loading...
Redacted sample · what €7 actually buys
The org names stay buyer-only — that’s the whole point of a First Look. But the structure, the data columns, the finding types, and the page-by-page map are right here. If anything below looks thinner than what you expected for €7, don’t buy.
Sample · page 2 of 14
Drawn from a real Q2 2026 AI-infrastructure First Look. Eight of the top 13 shown — orgs redacted. Velocity is 14-day rolling acceleration vs the 90-day baseline; contributor influx is 30-day net-new; Gini measures top-contributor concentration (lower is healthier).
| # | GitHub org | 14d Δ velocity | Contrib influx (30d) | Gini | Signal type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ■■■■■■■■■■-01 | +312% | +11 | 0.21 | infra buildout |
| 2 | ■■■■■■■■■■-02 | +267% | +8 | 0.18 | hiring burst |
| 3 | ■■■■■■■■■■-03 | +241% | +9 | 0.24 | platform migration |
| 4 | ■■■■■■■■■■-04 | +228% | +6 | 0.27 | shipping sprint |
| 5 | ■■■■■■■■■■-05 | +214% | +7 | 0.22 | infra buildout |
| 6 | ■■■■■■■■■■-06 | +196% | +5 | 0.31 | hiring burst |
| 7 | ■■■■■■■■■■-07 | +181% | +4 | 0.29 | framework migration |
| 8 | ■■■■■■■■■■-08 | +174% | +7 | 0.19 | shipping sprint |
In your PDF, the org column shows the actual GitHub org URL, clickable, plus a one-line context note (e.g. “founded 2024, no public funding round, ex-Stripe team”). The redaction is visual only on this preview — the artefact ships unredacted.
Sample · the kind of paragraph that appears on page 4
“The most counter-intuitive finding in this quarter’s AI-infra panel sits at rank #3 (■■■■■■■■■■-03). Despite a +241%14-day velocity acceleration — one of the highest in the panel — the org has not yet announced a hiring round, and the contributor influx pattern (9 new contributors in 30 days, all from teams with prior infra-platform experience) suggests the hiring will be quiet, not loud.
The decision rule on this one is: write the cold email this week, not when the announcement lands. Historical base rates say the announcement follows this signal pattern by 31 days median (21–47 IQR), and the cap-table window is widest before the round opens publicly.”
That paragraph is the deliverable’s thinking, not its data. The data lands in your CSV. The paragraph lands in your PDF. Both ship in the same delivery email, 24 hours after payment.
Page map · the full 14 pages
Every First Look ships at 14 pages exactly — the structure holds across all 20 sectors. If you don’t see at least three pages below that you’d screenshot into a memo, the bait isn’t the right shape for you and you should skip the €7.
Cover · context · data window
One-pager: sector chosen, period covered, total orgs scored (~2,400 in this sector), data window dates, methodology link, license note.
Top-25 ranked panel (page 1 of 2)
Orgs 1–13 in your sector, ranked by 14-day commit-velocity acceleration with two-period confirmation. Five-column table — the shape preview is below this map.
Top-25 ranked panel (page 2 of 2)
Orgs 14–25, same shape. Bottom of page: the cutoff threshold, what got pulled and why (false-positive filter).
Sector-specific finding · the leading-indicator beat
Quarter-on-quarter: which signal type leads fundraise announcements in this sector and by how many days. Numbers vary per sector — climate tech leads by ~28d, AI infra ~41d.
Three pre-Crunchbase breakouts (named, in your PDF)
Three orgs that the engine surfaced this quarter that haven't yet shown up on Crunchbase. Each one comes with: org URL, 90-day commit-velocity chart, named contributor influx, and the thesis-tagged reason it's interesting.
Contributor map · top 10 orgs × 30-day window
Per-org list of contributors who joined inside the last 30 days. Matters because contributor-influx-without-announcement is the cleanest leading indicator we measure.
False-positive watchlist
Three to five orgs that look hot but probably aren't — usually because the velocity is concentrated in one contributor or the signal cleanly maps to a public open-source release schedule.
What surprised us
Founder-written narrative on the two or three findings that didn't fit the prior. The page that gets screenshotted into IC memos most.
Decision rules · one-pager
If 14-day velocity > 2× 90-day baseline AND contributor-Gini < 0.30 AND no Crunchbase round in 12 months → write a check inside this window. The plain rule.
Methodology footnote · refresh schedule · CSV pointer
How the panel is refreshed weekly, how the data window slides, and where to download the raw CSV (link in the delivery email).
Glossary · signal-type definitions
Hiring burst vs. infra buildout vs. shipping sprint vs. platform migration. Each defined with a real example and a falsifiable test.
Reproducibility checklist
Step-by-step to re-run the regression yourself against the public Zenodo dataset. CC BY 4.0. The vault is the unlock to the source data.
Q&A reservation page
Three lines you fill in if anything in the PDF generated a question. Reply within 14 days, the founder responds inside one business day.
Credit-window reminder · upgrade path
Last page: the €7 you paid credits 100% toward Dashboard if you upgrade in 14 days. Founding rate locked. Apply by replying REQUEST CREDIT.
You’ve seen the shape. The bait fits or it doesn’t.
If the structure above matches the kind of artefact you’d actually use this week, the next move is the cart. €7, one coffee, 14-page sector-specific PDF + raw CSV in your inbox tomorrow. Credits 100% toward Dashboard if you upgrade in 14 days. Reply REFUND inside 30 days, no questions, keep the artefacts.
The 30-day Signal-or-It’s-Free guarantee covers everything on this preview. Two refunds in three years. Reply REFUND, the €7 returns inside one business day, you keep the PDF + CSV.